How does automatic time tracking work?

A desktop application records which applications, documents, and websites are in use, then maps that activity to projects and clients using keyword rules. A tax return open in a preparation package can be attributed to the right client automatically. It records activity rather than intent, so the output still needs review before it becomes billable time.

Are there privacy concerns with activity monitoring?

They need addressing directly. Staff are reasonably sensitive to software logging their application and website use, and in some jurisdictions monitoring carries notification obligations. Firms should be explicit about what is captured and why before deployment — introducing it quietly tends to damage trust more than the data is worth.

Does it include invoicing?

Yes, generating invoices from tracked billable time, alongside project budgeting and attendance tracking. It covers more of the time-to-invoice cycle than a pure tracker, though less than dedicated professional services billing.

How does it compare to Toggl Track and Clockify?

Those rely on manual timers with a lighter footprint. TimeCamp's differentiator is automatic capture, which produces more complete data but requires the monitoring conversation with staff. Firms whose problem is incomplete timesheets may prefer it; those whose staff would resent monitoring are better with a manual tool that gets used willingly.

TimeCamp

Time & Billing

Website: www.timecamp.com

TimeCamp at a glance

Best for: Firms wanting time captured without manual entry
Pricing model: Per user per month, with free tier
Deployment: Cloud, with desktop and mobile apps
Regions: Global
Key integrations: QuickBooks Online, Xero, Asana, Trello

Last reviewed July 2026. Pricing and features change frequently — confirm current details with the vendor.

TimeCamp is a time tracking application that can record work hours automatically by detecting which applications and documents are in use, alongside manual entry, timesheets, and timer-based tracking.

How accounting firms use it

The appeal is completeness. Time recorded from memory at the end of the week is systematically wrong — short tasks disappear, long ones round up, and the resulting profitability analysis rests on numbers nobody would defend. Automatic capture records what actually happened.

That comes with a cost. Software that logs application and website use is monitoring, and staff will treat it as such. Firms deploying it should say plainly what is captured and how it will be used; introducing it without that conversation reliably produces more resentment than the improved data justifies.

Key features

Automatic tracking runs as a desktop application recording application, document, and website activity, mapped to projects and clients through keyword rules. Manual entry and timers remain available for staff or firms preferring them.

Timesheets consolidate captured and manual time for approval. Project budgeting tracks hours and cost against plan, and attendance tracking covers working hours and absence.

Invoicing generates from billable time, and integrations export to QuickBooks Online, Xero, and common project management tools.

Who it’s best for

Firms whose difficulty is incomplete or retrospectively reconstructed timesheets, and who are prepared to have an open conversation with staff about activity monitoring.

Firms wanting lighter, manual-only tracking should use Toggl Track or Clockify. Those needing project accounting, write-up and write-down, or realization reporting need BigTime, BQE Core, or practice management with billing built in.

Visit TimeCamp

TimeCamp FAQ

How does automatic time tracking work?: A desktop application records which applications, documents, and websites are in use, then maps that activity to projects and clients using keyword rules. A tax return open in a preparation package can be attributed to the right client automatically. It records activity rather than intent, so the output still needs review before it becomes billable time.
Are there privacy concerns with activity monitoring?: They need addressing directly. Staff are reasonably sensitive to software logging their application and website use, and in some jurisdictions monitoring carries notification obligations. Firms should be explicit about what is captured and why before deployment — introducing it quietly tends to damage trust more than the data is worth.
Does it include invoicing?: Yes, generating invoices from tracked billable time, alongside project budgeting and attendance tracking. It covers more of the time-to-invoice cycle than a pure tracker, though less than dedicated professional services billing.
How does it compare to Toggl Track and Clockify?: Those rely on manual timers with a lighter footprint. TimeCamp's differentiator is automatic capture, which produces more complete data but requires the monitoring conversation with staff. Firms whose problem is incomplete timesheets may prefer it; those whose staff would resent monitoring are better with a manual tool that gets used willingly.

TimeCamp Alternatives

Other time & billing tools for accounting firms, ordered by how much of TimeCamp's functionality they cover.

CRM Project Management Time & Billing

TimeCamp

TimeCamp at a glance

How accounting firms use it

Key features

Who it’s best for

TimeCamp FAQ

TimeCamp Alternatives

Accelo

Anchor

BigTime

BQE Core

Cone

Bill4Time